asked you to prepare the 2nd phase of the IR and include the following:
- Describe their literature search strategy and criteria related to the “Review Question”.
1-2 paragraphs
- Identify literature search inclusion/exclusion criteria.
At least 2-3 inclusion criteria linked to the RQ.
At least 2-3 exclusion criteria linked to the RQ. - Perform a quality appraisal of evidence that meets the search inclusion criteria.
At least 3-5 empirical sources
At least 3-5 non-empirical sources - List the quality appraisal result in the appendix and save all pdf evidence and evaluations.
There should be 6-10 pdf sources submitted along with their quality appraisal.
- Discuss the quality appraisal results and submit all evidence and evaluations.
your quality appraisal portion needs to be expanded on to show similarities and differences in your chosen articles and need to use 6-10 articles- only 5 were here ( adding)
5
[Part
2
: Literature Review,
Quality Appraisal
, and Analysis]
by
Part 2: Literature Review, Quality Appraisal, and Analysis (APA Level 0 Heading)
Literature Search Strategy (Level 1 Heading)
Top online platforms such as PubMed, CINAHL, ProQuest, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect were used to answer the review question. Search terms were selected explicitly as “telemedicine training,” “healthcare provider burnout,” “telehealth adoption resistance,” “telemedicine leadership support,” and “technology acceptance model in healthcare.” Search operators AND and OR, along with truncation and phrase searching techniques, enabled results refinement during the search process.
Table 1
Inclusion and Exclusion Search Criteria
Inclusion search criteria
Exclusion search criteria
· Journal articles on telemedicine training and burnout
· Recent research within the past 5 years
· Journal articles that are peer-reviewed
· Research beyond 5 years
· Articles that are not peer-reviewed
· Research about telemedicine not associated with healthcare
· Studies not related to healthcare services
Quality Appraisal
The evaluation of selected literature relied on a quality appraisal to verify its relevance and reliability. Researchers assessed the studies according to their publication date, design structure, research participant numbers, telemedicine operational connection, and incorporation of theoretical frameworks. The DHA Appraisal Results Log in Appendix B delivers an in-depth analysis of the authors’ research.
References
Edú-Valsania, S., Laguía, A., & Moriano, J. A. (2022). Burnout: A review of theory and measurement.
International journal of environmental research and public health,
19(3), 1780.
Kruszyńska-Fischbach, A., Sysko-Romańczuk, S., Napiórkowski, T. M., Napiórkowska, A., & Kozakiewicz, D. (2022). Organizational e-health readiness: How to prepare the primary healthcare providers’ services for digital transformation.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
19(7), 3973.
Liwag, J. (2021).
Strategies for Catalyzing Clinicians’ Support of Telemedicine Programs in Rural Communities (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Shin, T. M., Ortega, P., & Hardin, K. (2021). Educating clinicians to improve telemedicine access for patients with limited English proficiency.
Challenges,
12(2), 34.
Totten, A. M., Womack, D. M., Griffin, J. C., McDonagh, M. S., Davis-O’Reilly, C., Blazina, I., … & Elder, N. (2024). Telehealth-guided provider-to-provider communication to improve rural health: A systematic review.
Journal of telemedicine and telecare,
30(8), 1209-1229.
Appendix A: DHA Review Question(s) Search Log
Database or location name
Search terms
Results
Notes
CINAHL
Telemedicine leadership support
1 result
The article was focused on leadership and was published in 2021
PubMed
Telemedicine training and burnout
39 results
Results for the past 5 years and relevant research reviewed
ScienceDirect
Telehealth and Healthcare
1202 results
Studies on different facets of telehealth in association with healthcare operations
ProQuest
Resistance to digital technology in healthcare
296993 results
Some articles were reviewed based on relevance to this research within the last 5 years.
2
Appendix B: DHA Appraisal Results Log
Author, date, and title
Evidence level and quality rating
Focus: HSO type, research domain, and the specific problem being addressed
Findings that help answer the review question(s)
Metrics and measures, if used
Source limitations
Edú-Valsania et al. (2022)
Level I, High Quality
Burnout measurement in healthcare providers
Establishes a method to measure burnout intensities in professionals
Surveys and statistical models
Limited to specific healthcare settings
Kruszyńska-Fischbach et al. (2022)
Level II, Medium Quality
Organizational e-health readiness
Tips for digital transformation in healthcare
Readiness assessment models
Focuses on primary healthcare, not specialists
Liwag (2021)
Level I, High Quality
Clinician support in telemedicine programs
Strategies for rural community telemedicine adoption
Qualitative interviews
The research investigated healthcare delivery exclusively within rural areas.
Shin et al. (2021)
Level I, High Quality
Telemedicine requires programs to train healthcare providers who will access this system.
Training initiatives for language-limited patients
Case studies and surveys
Language differences are a significant obstacle when patients utilize telemedicine services.
Totten et al. (2024)
Level I, High Quality
Telehealth-guided provider support
Impact of provider-to-provider telehealth guidance
Experimental study
Limited real-world application data