OL 600 Milestone 3

OL 600 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric

Global HR, Diversity, Risk Management, and Social Responsibility

Overview

For this milestone, due in Module Seven, you will  analyze HR strategic initiatives of managing HR globally, diversity and  inclusion, risk management, and social corporate responsibility that  impact an organization’s strategic goals.

Scenario

For this milestone, consider the following scenario: Assume the role  of a human resources director at a U.S.-based call center that is  currently based in the Midwest. The organization plans to expand their  call center locations in the states of South Carolina and Tennessee and  the country of India and needs to hire 100 employees. Your organization  has been primarily hiring “local” talent, many of whom have been  relatives of current employees. However, as the organization looks to  expand, there is a need to address new issues in diversity and  inclusion, assess risks that may occur because of expansion, define the  organization’s role to communities in new states and abroad, and  consider if current members of human resources or senior leaders might  need overseas assignments in order to get the India location staffed and  operating. As the human resources director, you will create a strategic  HR plan that addresses goals related to your organization’s growth. The  plan should have an influence across the organization to be successful.

Prompt

Refer to the chapter readings and module resources to support your  responses to each of the four critical elements below. Carefully read  and address each critical element as written, using detailed and  informative analysis that conveys critical thinking. The four critical  elements are aligned to the workplace technical competency within the HR  knowledge domain.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

Diversity and Inclusion:Explain differences within the workplace and describe appropriate strategies for managing a diverse workforce.

Risk Management:Determine appropriate proactive HR  activities and policies for mitigating risk and explain how these  strategies can be used within the organization.

Corporate Social Responsibility:Describe HR’s role in creating a culture of social responsibility within the organization and the organization’s community.

HR in the Global Context:Determine appropriate  strategies for properly preparing employees for an expatriate assignment  and explain how these approaches ensure ongoing engagement.

Be sure to incorporate instructor feedback on this milestone into your final submission.

Socially responsible human resource
practices: disclosures of the world’s best
multinational workplaces
Charbel Greige Frangieh and Hala Khayr Yaacoub
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to explore the socially responsible human resource practices disclosed by
the ‘‘World’s Best Multinational Workplaces,’’ with the aim of facilitating the benchmarking of these
disclosed practices.
Design/methodology/approach – Using the ‘‘World’s Best Multinational Workplaces’’ list was a
strategic decision in this study due to the rigorous methodology used in the preparation of the list as it
concentrated largely on the employees’ feedback, thus ensuring that these listed companies are actually
top workplaces. Both manifest and latent content analysis, are applied on 23 of the 25 listed Multinational
Corporations’ websites and reports, and company reviews done on these companies by the Great Place
to Work for to pinpoint the social responsible human resource practices.
Findings – Most of the practices disclosed are oriented toward enhancing the employees’ work
experiences whether that happened through improving their employment conditions or through having a
diverse and inclusive workplace. Thus, the employee-oriented human resource management practices
got the lion’s share of the disclosures, rather than the legal or the Corporate social responsibility–human
resources facilitation components.
Research limitations/implications – The practices that are already used at small and medium
enterprises within national contexts were not covered in this study.
Practical implications – It is assumed that businesses can benefit from the practices of these MNCs
which are considered as great places to work for, and as pioneers in their socially responsible human
resource approaches.
Originality/value – This study is likely to fill an important gap in the corporate social responsibility
literature, which gave pint-sized attention to the internal stakeholders, rendering the academic coverage
of employee-related practices scarce if not absent
Charbel Greige Frangieh
and Hala Khayr Yaacoub
are both based at the
Faculty of Business and
Management, University of
Balamand, El-Koura,
Lebanon.
Keywords CSR, Content analysis, Multinational corporations,
Social responsible human resource practices
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
An ethical movement is gaining momentum in the business world as a result of
management malpractices committed in the past decades. The ethical crisis drove
practitioners and researchers around the world to acknowledge the importance of
integrating business ethics and sustainability into their organizations. Engaging in
responsible practices was seen as a means to avoid crises and simultaneously lead to
financial benefits, (Doh et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2015; Voegtlin et al., 2012), produce social
capital (Maak, 2007) and enhance work-related behaviors like retention and workplace
commitment (Waldman and Galvin, 2008; Cameron, 2011; Doh et al., 2011; Doh and
Quigley, 2014; Miska et al., 2014). The misconducts in top management positions gained
extensive media attention due to their infamous contribution to the 2008 financial crisis. The
DOI 10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0226
VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019, pp. 277-295, © Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 1747-1117
Received 2 November 2017
Revised 30 March 2018
19 June 2018
Accepted 21 June 2018
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j PAGE 277
duty of engaging in responsible behavior is often assumed to the leaders of organizations
due to their ability to make a difference. “There is a need for managers to act with greater
concern toward others, which implies, taking into account others’ meanings and not only
those of shareholders” (Gomez and Crowther, 2012, p. 13).
Responsible leadership that aims at creating inclusiveness and sustainability acknowledges
that a business needs to adopt responsible practices toward a multitude of stakeholders,
not just shareholders, despite inherent difficulties (Maak and Pless, 2006; Frangieh and
Yaacoub, 2017). This leadership theory is embedded in Freeman’s stakeholder theory
(Freeman et al., 2004). A direct victim of the many reported ethical misconducts in firms are
the employees (Doh et al., 2011).To alleviate the unfortunate repercussions faced by
employees, one has to adopt socially responsible human resource practices (SRHRP). As
the literature on such good practices is scarce, due partly to the novelty of the topic and its
simultaneous complexity, a good start on this could be achieved by taking lessons from
other organizations who successfully implemented SRHRP into their organizations as
suggested by Lubna Olayan, CEO of Olayan Financing Company, in the 2017 World
Economic Forum Meeting.
The notion of socially responsible human resource management (SRHRM) and SRHRP is an
intersection between corporate social responsibility and human resource management
literature (Nie et al., 2018). The emphasis on SRHRM has been gaining momentum in the
business ethics literature (Greenwood, 2013, Jamali et al., 2015; Nie et al., 2018). SRHRM
involves offering practices that go beyond legal requirements. SRHRM aims to enhance
different aspects of an employee’s life and to fulfill an employee’s social and personal
expectations (Nie et al., 2018). These practices vary from work-life related benefits, to
continuous learning and training, competitive compensation, inclusive recruitment methods,
among others (Nie et al., 2018). This study pinpointed and extracted the practices as
disclosed by the corporations in the sample. All categorizations and coding took place after
analyzing all the disclosures in the sample, as the literature has not extensively covered
these practices. To fill this gap, the authors turned to the disclosures of practices of the
corporations on the World’s Best Multinational Workplaces (WBMW) list generated by Great
Place to Work for (GPtWf), for reasons that will be explained later. Extracting these practices
and categorizing them would create a valuable reference for interested scholars and
practitioners, as these are not readily available in the literature.
Disclosures of these practices, on both the multinational corporations’ own websites and on the
GPtWf’s website, were used to extract the SRHRP practices. The corporations’ disclosures are
believed to be valid due to the extensive scrutiny these big multinational workplaces undergo.
Any inconsistency between the disclosures and the actual practices is likely to be spotted and
reported due to the big army of employees who have high stakes in their own companies’
practices, as in the case of Sprint. Employees at Sprint pointed out inconsistencies between the
practices they actually benefited from and those reported by the company, thus exaggerated
practices caused embarrassment for Sprint (Filbeck and Preece, 2003).
In the following sections, the authors will first provide an overview of the literature on
corporate social responsibility, SRHRP and disclosures of which. The methodology used to
conduct this study will then be discussed, justifying the use of content analysis and the
WBMW list. Then, data representation and analysis will follow. The paper will culminate with
a concluding note stating limitations, research implications and further research
suggestions.
Review of the literature
Corporate social responsibility
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been highlighted due to the emphasis on
responsible behavior in organizations. CSR has been discussed thoroughly in the literature,
PAGE 278
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
without any unified definition given (Garcia and Greenwood, 2015). CSR was haled “as the
social obligation to impact society beyond pure profit maximization objectives” (Jamali
et al., 2015, p. 126). It was Yang and Rivers (2009) who emphasized CSR’s link to the
stakeholder theory and stated that the initiatives of an organization toward all of its
stakeholders translates to CSR. All definitions though highlight the fact that CSR practices
go beyond financial goals, to target the triple bottom line; thus, impacting the different
stakeholders, with positive impacts for every stakeholder involved, including the firm itself.
CSR messages in advertisements were found to mitigate the negative attitudes toward
companies (Mattila et al., 2011). CSR was also depicted to have positive impacts on firms’
profitability (Mishra and Suar, 2010). Overall, research highlighted CSR’s constructive role
(Griffin and Mahon, 1997; Waddock and Graves, 1997 as cited in Mishra and Suar, 2010)
without shutting all voices of skepticism. Neutral or negative relationship between CSR and
certain business outcomes were highlighted (Bromiley and Marcus, 1989 as cited in Mishra
and Suar, 2010). Despite the inconclusiveness, the topic of CSR has gained drive midst an
unwavering call by some business leaders and stakeholders for businesses to take a more
engaging role in society.
The increased scrutiny companies are facing as a result of the ethical crisis makes CSR a
delicate undertaking. Stakeholders, including consumers and societies at large, are
questioning the intentions of the companies behind the adoption of CSR. If perceived as
part of agenda building, CSR initiatives might backlash (Curtin, 1999; Vanhamme and
Grobben, 2009). Agenda building is the process by which a company tries to impact public
perception through media communication (Curtin, 1999). Only high-fit proactive initiatives
taken by organizations improved consumers’ perceptions and beliefs, whereas low-fit or
profit oriented initiatives actually had a negative impact on consumers’ perceptions and
beliefs (Becker-Olsen et al., 2006). In the latter case, the legitimacy of a company is put at
stake (Jahdi and Acikdilli, 2009). The pressures firms are facing from a variety of
stakeholders makes it increasingly important for the firms’ to produce CSR communications
that depict the actual nature of the practices adopted. Companies are voluntarily reporting
on their CSR practices (Ehnert, 2016), while conforming to different reporting standards that
highlight specifics of businesses that might have been overlooked in traditional CSR
communications. These CSR communications are an important aspect of business
nowadays, as they are greatly demanded by stakeholders, who request transparent
disclosures from corporations. Corporations, in turn, use these human resource disclosures
and social reporting to extend a dialogue with interested stakeholders (Das, 2013). CSR
reporting, thus, helps in decreasing the information asymmetry between managers and
stakeholders (Jamali et al., 2008) and allows for more scrutiny.
Socially responsible human resource practices
A corporation’s CSR policy has profound consequences on its human resource
management (Preuss et al., 2009). One of the several dimensions of CSR is the internal
stakeholders dimension, mainly employees. This dimension has received little attention in
the CSR literature, with more emphasis given to the external stakeholders (Kundu and
Gahlawat, 2015). Shen and Zhu (2011) termed CSR practices directed at employees as
SRHRP (Newman et al., 2016). Few scholars have attempted to define this notion. SRHRP is
seen as a three-dimensional notion: the legal compliance human resource management
component, the employee-oriented component and the general CSR facilitation component
(Shen and Zhu, 2011). The legal compliance component involves practices that are
regulated by the law such as minimum wage and child labor. The employee-oriented
dimension comprises practices that deal with the employees’ personal needs that are not
stipulated by law. The general CSR facilitation dimension covers HRM policies that help
employees engage in general CSR activities. The presence of these different dimensions
authenticates SRHRP relationship to notions like business ethics, corporate social
VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j PAGE 279
responsibility, responsible leadership and sustainability. Some scholars defined SRHRP
mainly in light of the general CSR facilitation dimension without incorporating the first two
dimensions (Shen and Benson, 2016). This study will follow the holistic definition provided
by Shen and Zhu (2011) for its inclusion of all of the three dimensions.
Socially responsible practices are practices that go beyond legal obligations (Shen and
Zhu, 2011). “Social responsibility begins where the law ends, namely ‘beyond compliance’”
(Mankelow, 2008, p. 2172). Socially responsible practices or SRHRPs are seen to aid in the
“humanization of the workplace”. Equal opportunities for employees, emphasis on work-life
balance, responsible recruitment, empowerment, better information flow, inclusion, superior
pay, skill-enhancing practices and rewarding employees’ participation in CSR activities are
a bundle of practices and policies that are perceived to be socially responsible (Kundu and
Gahlawat, 2015; Shen and Benson, 2016; European Commission, 2001 as cited in Kundu
and Gahlawat, 2015). Despite these assertive voices, the practices have not received
exhaustive coverage in the literature. A thorough search of the business ethics literature
indicates that the SRHRM coverage is still thin. Much of the studies on the topic have
discussed the positive outcomes of SRHRM, with little discussion of the actual SRHRP,
indicating a huge need to contribute to this area. Consequently, the research aims to
pinpoint the most popular SRHRPs by identifying those pinpointed by the WBMW
disclosures. The choice of the WBMW list is a calculated decision due to the huge reliance
on employees’ feedback in the production of the list among other factors that will be
discussed later.
CSR activities and especially SRHRPS are not selfless charitable acts. They result from
strategic considerations and are a “way of doing business” as Philips CEO, Frans van
Houten, comments. These practices are perceived to have a positive impact on
organizations with several studies attempting to test the relationship between SRHRPs and
work-related behaviors. The literature covered the impact of SRHRM on organizational
citizenship (Shen and Zhu, 2011), organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) (Newman
et al., 2016), job satisfaction (Kundu and Gahlawat, 2015), organizational identification and
overall justice perceptions (De Roeck et al., 2014), intellectual capital (Barrena-Martı́nez
et al., 2016), turnover intentions (Liu et al., 2014) and women turnover intentions (Nie et al.,
2018).
Shen and Zhu (2011) tested the impact of SRHRM on organizational citizenship using
hierarchical multiple regression analysis. Their study found a positive relationship between
organizational citizenship and the existence of SRHRM in its three different dimensions.
OCB was also empirically proven to be enhanced in the presence of SRHRM by Newman
et al. (2016). Newman et al. (2016) adopted structural equation modeling of dyadic data
that was extracted from survey questionnaires administered on Chinese employees and
their supervisors. The appreciation of a diverse workplace was also proven to boost positive
employee attitude toward their organizations (Kundu, 2003). Kundu and Gahlawat (2015)
used multiple regression analysis to analyze 563 questionnaires and found a positive
relationship between SRHRP and job satisfaction, and a negative relationship between
SRHRP and the intent to quit. Job satisfaction was also found to be positively related to
SRHRPs through SRHRPs positive impact on overall justice perceptions and organizational
identification in a study conducted by De Roeck et al. (2014) on 181 hospital employees.
Barrena-Martı́nez et al. (2016) studied the impact of socially responsible human resource
policies on intellectual capital by using regression analysis. They concluded that having
SRHRM can improve communication and facilitate the exchange of knowledge and skills in
a corporation. Liu et al. (2014) also used regression analysis and proved that CSR directed
toward employees decreases managers’ turnover intentions. In another study related to
turnover intentions, Nie et al. (2018) studied the impact of SRHRP on female employees’
turnover intentions by using structural equation modeling. The study proved that family
oriented measures can help decrease female employees’ turnover intentions. In this article,
PAGE 280
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
the authors highlighted two important SRHRP, equal career opportunity practices and
work–family integration practices. However, the mention of specific SRHRP in studies is
scarce. The extraction of these practices would allow authors to identify which SRHRP have
more positive impact than others. It would also aid in the development of questionnaires, a
common tool in this line of research.
In an attempt to explain the reasons behind the presence of a relationship between SRHRPs
and work-related behaviors, scholars have relied on two theories: the social identity theory
and the social exchange theory. The latter is defined as: “the desire of individuals to strive to
maintain some perceived superior distinctiveness conferred by membership within an ingroup” (Lewis, 2011, p. 966). This theory suggests that individuals will identify more with an
organization if they perceive it to have a respectable reputation. Identification with such an
organization leads to heightened self-esteem (Newman et al., 2016; Turker, 2009). The
social exchange theory “involves a series of interactions that generate obligations”
(Emerson, 1976 as cited in Cropanzano and Mitchell, 2005). In a socially responsible
organization, employees feel the need to respond to the practices provided by the
organization by producing positive work-related behaviors (Newman et al., 2016; Blau,
1964).
The authors of this article participate in the discussions on SRHRP by pinpointing the most
common SRHRP in the WBMW. A similar study targeting sustainable HR reporting in
Fortune’s Best 250 companies was conducted by Ehnert (2016). The authors though
believe that the best source to extract SRHRP are corporations considered to be great
workplaces in the eyes of their employees, rather than just successful organizations. This
belief guided the choice of the WBMW as the sample provider. In the following section, the
authors will explore the concept of human resource disclosures. The concept is
interconnected with SRHRP, as most HR disclosures are of the socially responsible type.
Human resource disclosures
Corporations have used the internet as a disclosure medium (Branco and Rodrigues, 2009)
to present human resource or social disclosures. The internet is seen as means to open a
broad dialogue with stakeholders (Das, 2011) interested in human resource disclosures.
This attempt to provide the public with information has been largely voluntarily by the
management of corporations (Alvarez, 2015). It is fundamentally a response to
stakeholders’ call for more transparency with respect to human resource reporting (Das,
2011). Das (2011) argues that stakeholders are demanding more access to information
concerning compensation and benefits, work–life balance, development equal
opportunities, security, among other HR practices. Several scholars have highlighted the
positive impact HR reporting has on corporations. Dominguez (2011) found that human
resource disclosure positively and significantly impacts a corporations’ reputation. The
author did content analysis on the annual reports of 105 Spanish corporations and
regression analysis was used to determine the impact of the disclosures on the
corporations’ reputations. The positive impact HR reporting has on corporations has also
been highlighted earlier in the literature by Craig and Hussey (1982) and Frederiksen and
Westphalen (1998). Craig and Hussey (1982) argued that HR reporting improves
employees’ performance. Frederiksen and Westphalen (1998) found that HR disclosures
aid in attracting and retaining individuals.
Other studies also attempted to address different issues pertaining to HR reporting. Branco
and Rodrigues (2009) analyzed whether “Best companies to work for” disclosed more
social responsibility information than companies in the same industries and with a similar
size. The study allowed the conclusion that “best companies to work for” do disclose more
social responsibility information. This is due to the understanding that social disclosures
play an integral part in building a good social responsibility reputation. Alvarez (2015)
attempted to analyze whether satisfying shareholders needs of information or enhancing the
VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j PAGE 281
image to meet the demands of the diverse stakeholders drives a corporation to disclose
social information. Alvarez found that information disclosed by corporations relates more to
employees’ welfare rather than their impact on enhancing corporation’s value. Despite the
presence of various studies discussing social disclosures and social responsible human
resource practices, the authors did not find any that identified what practices are mostly
disclosed. The authors believe that pinpointing the human resource practices disclosed by
corporations would be of importance to both scholars and practitioners. Although
disclosures might be an exaggerated platform for real practices, the authors believe that
multinational corporations will not use them to present whitewashed images of themselves.
These multinational corporations employ thousands of employees from around the world
who can easily identify any discrepancy between reported HR practices and actual ones.
The presence of such discrepancies would have negative consequences on the
corporation, as in the case of Sprint. Sprint, an American telecommunication company, was
placed on “Working Mother’s” list. Employees at the company were disgruntled as much of
the reported practices were not accurate. The Wall Street Journal voiced the employees’
dissatisfaction and, consequently Sprint was dropped from later surveys and caused the
company much embarrassment (Filbeck and Preece, 2003).
Methodology
The study uses companies listed on the WBMW as the sample for the study. The use of the
WBMW that is generated by GPtWf in cooperation with Fortune (listed under the name of:
Top 25 Global Companies to Work for) is due to the rigorous methodology used that
concentrated largely on employees’ feedback. The reliance on lists generated by the GPtWf
is not foreign to the business academic literature as is evident with the use of Fortune’s ‘Top
100 Companies” and “Top 100 Companies to Work For” which are produced in partnership
with GPtWf (Johnson et al., 2011; Filbeck and Preece, 2003; Gropper and Jahera, 2005;
Bernardi, 2006). The use of these lists as sample providers in top rated journals (ABDC
Journal Quality List) authenticates both their importance and their reliability in academic
research.
The methodology used by the GPtWf ensures that the companies listed actually embody the
characteristics of a top workplace. Two-thirds of GPtWf’s assessment is based upon feedback
received from the employees through the “Trust Index Employee Survey” as GPtWf. These
surveys are both confidential and anonymous and take about 15-20 min to complete
(Greatplacetowork.in, 2017). The survey is made up of 56 statements categorized into five
dimensions: credibility, respect, fairness, pride and camaraderie. The survey also includes two
open-ended questions (Greatplacetowork.in, 2017). The remaining one-third of GPtWf’s
assessment is produced by “The Culture Audit,” which offers an understanding of the
organizations practices and programs. “The Culture Audit” is a questionnaire that is usually
completed by the organizations’ human resource departments and comprises of two parts,
one of which is related to the employee demographics, the companies’ financial performance
and employee benefits (Greatplacetowork.net, 2017). The second part consists of openended questions addressing the company’s philosophy and practices like hiring and
employee development. The questionnaire is built on nine main themes which GPtWf deem
important for the establishment of a great workplace: thanking, caring, sharing, listening,
speaking, developing, celebrating, hiring and inspiring (Greatplacetowork.net, 2017). For a
company to be listed in the GPtWf’s 25 WBMW, it should fulfill several criteria. The corporation
should be on at least five national Best Workplace lists (GPtWf produces several lists e.g:
Fortune’s top 100 companies to work for, Best Workplaces for Parents, Best Workplaces for
Diversity, etc.), have at least 5,000 employees worldwide and at least 40 per cent of the
workforce (or 5,000 employees) must be based outside the home country (Work, 2017).
Additional points are given for companies that survey a larger percentage of its workforce
globally (Work, 2017).
PAGE 282
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
The study used content analysis to collect data from the sample. Content analysis is a
method of coding and categorizing texts based on systematic chosen criteria to understand
the meanings of the messages in the texts (Vuontisjärvi, 2006; Weber, 1985; Maxfield and
Babbie, 2013). It is a “a research technique for making replicable and valid inferences from
data to their context” (Krippendorff, 1989, p. 403). Content analysis is done at two levels,
the manifest and the latent. The first aims at providing a quantitative description of the
content of the text (Saunders et al., 2015), while the latter aims at interpreting the content of
the text (Holsti, 1969; Duriau et al., 2007). Some scholars argue for the manifest level and
thus the quantitative nature of the method (Saunders et al., 2015; Neuendorf, 2002), while
others insist on the qualitative nature of the method that allows for contextual interpretations
(Payne et al., 2011).
The choice of WBMW as the sample of the study is due to the rigorous methodology used in
generating the list. The sample consists of large corporations (5,000þ employees) that
provide rich data (Campopiano and De Massis, 2015). The authors chose multinational
companies due to the corporations’ social impact. Both companies’ websites (CSR Reports
and other reports and sections on the websites) and GPtWf reviews on companies are used
as data sources. The authors analyzed over 300 pages extracted from the corporations’
websites and GPtWf reviews. Content analysis on companies’ reports is often used in
business research (Campopiano and De Massis, 2015; Duriau et al., 2007; Palmer and
Short, 2008), more specifically in the HR context (Vuontisjärvi, 2006). Content analysis on
organizational documents is free from researcher bias, as the documents were not written
for research purposes (Payne et al., 2011). Such methodology allows for the extraction of
rich meanings from text (Duriau et al., 2007) and generally provides more reliability and
replication (Potter and Levine-Donnerstein, 1999). The use of organizational documents has
been criticized on the basis of being biased accounts written for specific audiences
(Smithin and Huff, 1991; Duriau et al., 2007). To counteract such dangers, both
organizational documents and GPtWf reviews are used as per the recommendation of
Kabanoff (1996).
A pilot study on four of the sample’s companies’ websites generated several themes that will
be covered in this study, namely, employment, diversity and inclusion, and CSR-HR
facilitation. The pilot study was done separately by the two authors, and the results of their
analysis were discussed till agreement was reached. Employment comprises of compensation
and benefits, training and development, recruitment, company culture and safety. Diversity
and inclusion encompasses diversity recruitment, training for diversity enrichment and
employee resource groups. HR disclosures were found in more than one section and report
for the same company. All relevant English written documents and sections of each
company’s website and any links provided through these websites were covered to ensure
thoroughness. The social responsible human resource disclosures extracted from the sample
can be found in Figure 1.
The sample studied consisted of 25 multinational workplaces. Two out of the 25 companies
were excluded due to the absence of an English version of their websites and having no
review. The sample’s 23 websites generated 154 website pages and sections and 23
company reports in the form of pdf files that were relevant to the study’s topic. The study
also included 13 different reviews for 13 companies provided by the GPtWf.
Data analysis
Employment
The theme of employment was discussed extensively throughout the data. Much of the data
extracted is from the sustainability reports or website sections like “Career,” “Employee and
Culture,” “Benefits” and “Why work here” among other sections. Whilst the sub-themes of
“compensation and benefits” and “training and development” were discussed lengthily
VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j PAGE 283
Figure 1
Socially responsible HR practices
under the employment conditions, recruitment (outside the theme of diversity and
inclusion), safety and company culture where disclosed less often. The different
components of compensation and benefits are discussed non-proportionately under
“Compensation,” “Retirement, Financial, and Insurance Plans and Schemes,” “Work-Life
Balance Benefits,” “Health and Wellness Benefits” and “Additional Perks and Benefits.”
Corporations (n = 17) reported the use of fair, competitive and attractive salaries and
compensation packages through their websites. Their stock-related incentives were
disclosed through the GPTWf’s reviews (n = 5). The majority of the corporations in the
sample reported the offering of competitive salaries. This is not surprising as one the few
SRHRPs discussed in the literature was competitive salaries (Nie et al., 2018). To scheme
fair and competitive compensation plans, Google audits fair pay practices, sets a
compensation structure in accordance with the employees’ roles, and run regular
monitoring to ensure that the compensation philosophy and structure are functioning as
envisioned. Daimler ensures that they pay standard rates as per the markets and the
industry and that the salary levels comply with regulations set by collective agreements
when present. Mars compares its executives’ pay to peers in 20 large global diverse
companies to ensure that their executives are being paid fairly. Several corporations
reported the offering of salaries that are customized to the different markets they are
present in.
Corporations have also disclosed the use of performance related rewards to guarantee that
compensations offered are competitive. At Gore, employees are asked to play a role in
determining part of the compensation of their fellow associates to gain greater insight about
employees’ contribution that might have been overlooked without the insights provided.
Autodesk offers a sales commission plan for sales employees and an incentive plan for
employees not eligible for the sales commission plan. The incentive plan is an annual bonus
program based on the financial performance of the corporation and the employee’s
performance as assessed by the direct manager. Cisco has a “Connected Recognition
PAGE 284
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
Program” that allows employees to nominate another employee or team for a monetary
reward. Profit sharing and stock options including restricted stock units to employees are
also among the incentives offered. At AccorHotels, “Accor Hotels in Action” is a scheme
that allows employees the regular purchase of AccorHotels stocks under favored
conditions. Diageo provides employees with the opportunity to take part of the share
incentive plans by linking long-term business performance with individual rewards through
the corporation’s stock price growth. Corporations are thus actively trying to generate
compensation plans that are fair, competitive and attractive for their employees by devising
different mechanisms.
The offering of financial plans (n = 20) and insurance schemes (n = 3) has been reported on
the corporations’ websites (n = 11) and on the GPTWf’s reviews (n = 11). A vast majority
of the financial plans offered are retirement related plans with a few offering financial
coaching. Retirement financial plans offered were mostly Retirement Saving Plans (RSP).
The RSP most common in the data was the USA-based 401K, which is a saving plan
sponsored by the employer that allows the employees to invest a portion of their pre-tax
salaries. At Autodesk, employees have the right to save a portion of their salaries in some
kind of a mutual fund, a target date fund, or a brokerage option. Several corporations
reported the presence of pre-tax saving accounts through the GPTWf’s reviews, but no
specific plans other than the 401k were disclosed. In several corporations, employees’
contributions in the pre-tax saving accounts are either fully or partially matched by their
employers. Mars promotes the pre-tax saving accounts through channels like newsletters
and webinars. Financial planning programs and workshops to help employees with financial
planning were also among the offerings reported by the corporations. American express
offers its employees on-site and telephone-based coaching aimed at helping employees in
saving money in their every-day financial operations. Insurance plans on offer included
income protection, insurance against disability, and life insurance. NetApp offered
Supplemental Life Insurance, Basic Life and AD&D insurance. A vast majority of companies
reported the offering of retirement related benefits, whereas a few reported the offering of
non-health insurance schemes. Both financial plans and performance related rewards aim
at making salaries and packages more competitive. While this paper introduces these
practices as important social responsible practices being implemented at multinational
corporations, there was barely any mention of which in the SRHRP literature.
The disclosures of work-life balance benefits can be categorized into “Leaves and
Holidays” and “Flexible Work arrangements”. “Leaves and Holidays” were reported by the
organizations through their websites (n = 14) and GPTWf reviews (n = 7). Paid sick leave to
care for relatives or children, parental leaves, paid vacations, medical leaves, death leaves,
paid sabbaticals, holidays and other leaves of absences are offered by the corporations in
the sample. Parental leaves are accessible for parents by birth or adoption by several
corporations. Some of these corporations provide leaves that only adhere to the laws of
each country, whereas other companies provide leaves that exceed those stipulated by the
law. These leaves are either fully paid, partially paid or unpaid depending on their length
and the law stipulations. Monsanto offers a wide variety of absence leaves including military
service and duty, academic assignments and jury duty among others. Holidays reported
were mostly US based holidays as Martin Luther King Jr Day, Thanksgiving, Christmas and
New Year. Cisco also offered birthday day offs for their employees as it believes that little
things count the most.
Flexible work arrangements were disclosed by the corporations on their websites (n = 11)
and through the GPTWf reviews (n = 8). Among the flexible work arrangements reported are
flexible work hours, telecommuting, remote working and homeworking, rotating shift
schedules, compressed workweeks, phased retirement planning, job sharing and part time.
3M offers a “Flexibility program” that helps employees rework their schedule according to
their needs. Hyatt Hotels runs a “Housekeeping Flextime Program” that allows colleagues to
VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j PAGE 285
end their shift earlier if their work assignments are completed. Daimler Financial Services
allows two part-time employees to share a single position. Some companies even reported
the amount of vacations given and the percentage of employees who use flexible work
arrangements. Work-life balance benefits were commonly believed to be positively related
to employees’ health, their retention and productivity. There was little mention of flexible
work arrangements in the literature as is the case with most practices revealed in the study.
“Medical insurances” and “additional health and wellness services and benefits” are the two
mostly disclosed themes under health and wellness. The offering of Medical, Vision and
Dental insurances and programs were disclosed by the companies through their websites
(n = 11) and the GPTWf reviews (n = 13). EMC offers several types of health plan options
including Preferred Provider Organization and Health Maintenance Organization. Health
Savings Account is also offered by EMC to meet the diverse needs of the employees and
their respective families. NetApp provides its employees with the chance to meet the dentist
of their choice whilst still being covered by the companies’ dental plan. Health insurance for
retirees and long-term employee care were also offered by a number of companies to
provide employees with long-term security. Fertility treatments, prescription drug subsidy
and alternative treatments such as acupuncture are also covered by insurances provided
by some companies.
A variety of health and wellness services and benefits are also accessible at some
corporations as reported through their websites (n = 16) and the GPTWf reviews (n = 14).
Among the services and benefits offered onsite are health-related screenings, tests and
shots. Breast cancer screening, blood pressure screening, complete biometric screening,
skin cancer screening, prostate cancer screening, free health screenings, diabetes checks,
cholesterol tests, flu shots, allergy shots, pneumonia shots, allergy shots are commonly on
offer. Some of these benefits are extended to retired employees at the SAS Institute. “Best
Doctors” is another consultancy service provided for employees free of charge that
provides the employees with an expert second opinion. Fitness centers, sponsored offside
gym memberships and fitness reimbursement, telemedicine, nutritional advice through
registered dietitians, health and wellness campaigns, massage sessions and therapy,
weight watchers meetings, healthy diets, online health and wellness-related material, yoga
classes and onsite pharmacies are other benefits and services on offer. This emphasis on
health and wellness depicts the deep belief in the strong interrelations between health and
work among these MNCs and their commitment to take whatever steps possible to ensure
the most attainable health statuses for their employees.
Several other perks and benefits are obtainable at the companies premises as reported on
their websites (n = 18) and the GPTWf reviews (n = 13). Micro-kitchens, subsidized food,
free snacks, on-site hair salons, nail salons, personal concierge services, banking, dry
cleaning, car washing, on-site mailing service, subsidized public transportation, take-home
meals, on-site or near back up childcare centers, in-house discounts, offsite discounts,
offsite subsidized childcare, lactation rooms, adoption support, rest and relaxation lounges
and pets at work, are among the perks offered by the corporations. Pets at work; for
example, can be found at Mars where “pets at the office are as commonplace as the
associates who work there”. These perks fall under family, recreation and on-site benefits
sections. These are offered out of the MNCs belief in the extended lives of their employees
and the important hedonic, leisure and other important persons and aspects in their
employees’ well-being. Despite the emphasis on these practices in the corporations’
disclosures, there is little to no mention of which in the literature. This paper acts like a mirror
of the SRHRPs at MNCs and their gateway to the literature.
Training and development was discussed extensively in the corporations’ disclosures (n = 20)
and less so in the GPTWf’s reviews (n = 3). The training and development related disclosures
covered leadership and development trainings (n = 18), technical and specialized skills
trainings (n = 16), interpersonal skills trainings, performance management and skills
PAGE 286
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
identification (n = 11), tuition programs and reimbursements (n = 7), continuous learning (n =
6) and mentoring and coaching (n = 6). Leadership trainings and programs were discussed
extensively in the data. Such programs are perceived to aid in the development of the
workforce, prepare employees for future managerial and leadership positions and lead to all
types of positive results and thus achieve competitive advantages. For those purposes,
Scotiabank developed the iLead, a leadership development program. Technical and
specialized skills training as those offered on the use of social media, sales, finance, manual
handling and hospitality are highly reported in the data.
Various channels were used to deliver these trainings whether through “In-House
Universities” or specially developed courses. NetApp has an “in-house university” while
Mars has a “Wrigley leadership Academy” and a “Mars University”. The courses are offered
through traditional classroom settings, the internet, webinars, seminars, conferences and
podcasts among others. Tuition programs and reimbursements are also provided by some
corporations for their employees to enroll in classes in a variety of universities. Mentoring
and coaching are also used for the collaborated growth of the employees.
These corporations rely on performance management and skills identification programs to
pinpoint the skills that employees need for their development. Clear communication,
feedback and career development goals are common themes across most programs in the
sampled corporations. Among these programs is the performance management program
implemented by SC Johnson. This program constitutes of five phases: objective setting,
ongoing feedback, ongoing coaching, performance review and career development
planning. At Monsanto, the performance management program is titled “Development,
Performance and Rewards”, and it addresses the three themes in its title. Several of the
corporations in our sample explicitly highlighted lifelong learning; whilst, others implicitly
expressed the importance of continuance learning that addresses each employees’ wants
and needs. Employees have access to training and development programs that might not
be directly linked to their current positions. This access provides the employees with the
opportunity to develop skills in their areas of interest, which leads to flexibility in choosing
future tracks and jobs. These findings indicate that companies take these training and
development endeavors very seriously and often selflessly out of their belief that companies
can only grow through the growth of its people. The literature had previously discussed
continuous learning but in marginal ways (Nie et al., 2018). This study, on the other hand,
explores the concept of continuous learning, and training and development more
thoroughly.
Recruitment endeavors were disclosed through the corporations’ websites (n = 11) and the
GPTWf reviews (n = 1), mainly through university recruitment, referrals, partnerships and
recruitment trainings. Most of these corporations reported the use of university-focused
hiring programs to attract talent. EMC, for example, nurtures relationships with university
students through its “EMC University Relations” unit. It also relies on a “Campus
Ambassador Program” where EMC interns return to their campuses and assist in branding
EMC in their respective universities.
Employee referrals are also relied on in the recruitment process. Autodesk encourages its
employees to refer suitable candidates. Employees at Cadence receive bonuses that range
up to $5,000 for making appropriate referrals. Other innovative recruitment channels are
used by some companies, such as NetApp which disclosed the presence of a college grad
program that provides recruits with a “world class on-boarding experience”. The program
consists of several courses and opportunities to meet with teams that these recruits will
work with later on. AccorHotels allows interested candidates to apply via social media
platforms like YouTube, Snapchat, Instagram and Facebook. Recruitment, however, was
moderately discussed outside the scope of diversity and inclusion. However, the
mentioning of recruitment practices outside this scope aimed at pointing out the importance
of the role of the current employees in filling future vacancies, or to the trainings of recruits,
VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j PAGE 287
even before joining the organization, or to the usage of the unorthodox mediums of
recruitment to cater to the needs of the new generation. Recruitment received much more
emphasis in the corporations’ disclosures than it did in the SRHRM literature. This study
aids in highlighting recruitment from a SRHRP perspective.
A company’s culture and means to improve it were discussed by several corporations
through their websites (n = 14), mainly by emphasizing an open culture to reinforce
communication, engagement, and empowerment. Google’s company-wide meetings are
hosted and broadcasted live to all offices around the world. Googlers (Google employees)
are given the chance to raise their questions to top management in these meetings, after
being voted for by Googlers themselves to indicate levels of interest. Mars has designed
open offices that encourage communication and networking among all classes of
employees. Some of the corporations in the sample use surveys to ensure that employees
have the right channels to participate in decision-making. Daimler Financial Services
believes that “the company lives for and through its employees”, and that’s why their
feedback is taken seriously. Some corporations have additionally disclosed the presence of
non-monetary recognition awards. At AccorHotels, “Bernaches Awads” are handed to
employees who embody the values of the organization. Embodying a culture of
receptiveness, empowerment and recognition is of utmost importance to minimize
resistance, increase engagement and align goals.
Measures to ensure safety were also disclosed by corporations (n = 10). SAS through its
“Security and Safety and Risk Management” department launches programs and allocates
resources to eliminate potential harmful incidents. Mars through its “Safety, Environmental
Affairs, and Security management system” applies a systematic approach to ensure that
international standards are recognized on all of its sites. Reviews on training, incident rates
and risk management measures. Atento delivers e-courses on safety, hygiene and
emergencies. Less than half of the corporations disclosed safety-related measures,
probably due to the fact that many of them are working relatively in safe industries and other
risks are unfortunately hard to account for. Similar to other SRHRPs, culture and safety
received more attention in the disclosures than they did in the SRHRM literature,
furthermore affirming the infancy of the SRHRP literature. The emphasis on disclosing
practices under the employment category is consistent with the literature. The corporations,
understudy, disclosed more information related to the employees’ welfare than those
contributing to the corporations’ value as was argued by Alvarez (2015). Das (2011) had
similarly discussed stakeholders’ call for more information related to compensation and
benefits, training and development and work-life balance among others. This is consistent
with the findings of this paper, as much of the disclosures are related to the aforementioned
themes. This depicts that the disclosures are largely a response to stakeholders’ demands.
Diversity and inclusion
One of the major themes extracted from the data was that of Diversity and Inclusion (n = 23). It
was either discussed in a separate section titled “Diversity and Inclusion”, or in social
responsibility reports, or in the reviews provided by the GPtWf. Twenty one out of the 23
corporations disclosed practices to enhance diversity and inclusion, whether under “Diversity
Recruitment”, “Training for Diversity Enrichment”, “Employee Resource Groups (ERGs)” and/
or “Benefits and Events”. Diversity and inclusion are interconnected themes. EMC pointed out,
on its website, that diversity is about the differences in the employees’ gender, ethnicity,
background and education among others, whereas inclusion has to do with using these
differences to enhance business results through providing an inclusive environment. Ensuring
diversity and inclusion makes firms stronger (Scotiabanks), and disclosing rates about them
ensures accountability (Google). 6Women, “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender” (LGBT)
Community, African Americans, Hispanics, Employees with disabilities and veterans have
been at the receiving end of most of these efforts.
PAGE 288
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
A vast majority of the multinational corporations (n = 21) in our sample highlighted diversity
in their recruitment processes. Diversity recruitment is the process of implementing
particular recruitment methods that enhance diversity in an organization. Addressing the
talent pipeline (n = 8), expanding recruitment options (n = 7), changing selections
strategies (n = 5) and generating diversity related positions (n = 9) are the main sub-themes
discussed in diversity recruitment. Several of the corporations disclosed the use of methods
that aid in bolstering a diverse talent pipeline (n = 8). Multinational workplaces in our sample
also relied on diverse sources (universities, career fairs and events that consist namely of
underrepresented groups), partnerships and initiatives to expand recruitment options
(n = 7). Efforts to bolster this pipeline include providing classes on computer science in
Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), offering STEM education programs
for under-represented groups, and Job Shadowing programs that introduce female youth to
career opportunities in the hospitality industry (Google, EMC, Hilton). Google have
employed a bigger number of schools as a recruitment source than they did in the past.
Adobe recruits applicants from diverse sources like HBCUs and Hispanic-serving
institutions. 3M is supporting “Hiring Our Heroes” that contributes in providing meaningful
employment opportunities for veterans and their spouses.
In the selection stage, multinational workplaces are relying on practices, policies and
material that ensure the fair treatment of diverse applicants (n = 5). Google uses structured
interviews with specific standards to combat unconscious bias in the interview stage. At
Daimler Financial Services, an employee with a disability highlighted the respect he felt in
the interviewing process. He stated that the only time his disability came up as a subject in
the interview was when the interviewer asked him if there are efforts the company can take
to support him in the workplace. Additional efforts taken by companies in the recruitment
process include hiring employees and creating positions for diversity related goals,
especially recruitment related targets (n = 9). Employees with such responsibilities held
positions as “Vice President of Global Diversity and Inclusion”, “Global Diversity and
Inclusion Director”, “Director of talent and cultures” and “Chief of Diversity Officer”, among
others. The multitude of practices and policies disclosed by companies as part of their
diversity recruitment efforts prove that the companies are taking serious measures to ensure
that the recruitment of a diverse workforce is systematic, rather than random. The literature
had previously highlighted the concept of inclusive recruitment methods (Nie et al., 2018);
however, this study sheds more light on it.
Training for Diversity Enrichment was a common topic in the companies’ disclosures
(n = 18) and GPTWf‘s reviews (n = 6). “Training and development programs for
underrepresented and minority groups” (n = 16) and “diversity and bias training” (n = 10)
are both offered for facilitating inclusion and expanding the development paths of the
underrepresented groups. Mainly women, challenged associates and minorities have been
at the receiving end of most of these efforts. EMC launched a program called FastLane to
accelerate women’s careers at the organization by offering a three-day residency program
to refine important leadership skills for high performing women. Corporations, as Hilton,
have mentorship programs to provide enhanced development chances for a diverse set of
employees. SAS provide coaching for its autistic employees by partnering with the right
specialized bodies. Diversity and bias trainings, whether under “Cultural Competency”,
“Diversity Management”, or “Breaking Bias” are aimed at enhancing cultural awareness and
mitigating unconscious bias and discrimination. Online courses offered by Hilton Hotels
University and leadership sessions at Diageo are set for the purpose. All these efforts aimed
at ensuring diversity and equity in their labor forces are not just made for meeting goals or
standards, but because of a true belief in the sound business sense and the sustainable
benefits these bring to the corporations under study.
Employee resource groups (ERGs), embodied by 16 companies under various labels, are
employee groups and networks for underrepresented minorities that support the inclusion,
VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j PAGE 289
networking and development of their constituents. ERGs provide mentoring and support
(n = 7), opportunities for training and development (n = 5), host events (n = 3), initiate
awareness campaigns (n = 2), aid in the recruitment process (n = 2) and provide market
insights (n = 1). The networks included support groups for Women, African Americans,
Latinos, Hispanics, associates with disabilities, Veterans, LGBT community, Indians and
Asians among others. Prominent members of these groups facilitate networking, provide
mentoring, training and support for the various members of their community. 3M’s Military
Support Network, for example, provide scholarship and professional development
opportunities for its members. Google’s ERG called Gayglers, a LGBT community group,
raises awareness about and gives support to LGBT-related issues. Accor Hotels’ ERG
called “Women at AccorHotels Generation” (WAAG) initiated a campaign to combat gender
stereotypes. These ERGs are acknowledged for aiding in the recruitment, inclusion and
development of a diverse workforce. They are essential for engaging STEM talents
(members with science, technology, engineering or math skills), and for providing insights
into related markets. These networks with chapters or groups throughout the dispersions of
the corporations are perceived to be a true asset for their companies. Training for diversity
enrichment and employee resource groups were discussed in the corporations’
disclosures, with no trace of which whatsoever in the SRHRM or HR disclosures literature.
Benefits targeted at minority groups (n = 10), and events that connect diverse employees
(n = 8) are disclosed by the GPtWf reviews and to a lesser extent on the companies’
websites (n = 3). Equal benefits for married employees in heterosexual or same-sex
marriages, parental leave for non-birth parents in same-sex relationships, medical coverage
for sex reassignment surgery and health-care benefits for transgender employees are some
of the disclosed benefits. All these cited Diversity and Inclusion initiatives are not part of
CSR role playing, but an essential part of a true business making, in terms of having a
diverse pool of talents much needed to comprehend the diverse markets in the growing and
accelerated world of today. Inclusion was highlighted in both the corporations’ disclosures
and the literature (Frangieh and Yaacoub, 2017). The literature had discussed femaleoriented SRHRPs (Nie et al., 2018); however, the corporations’ disclosures covered wider
practices that targeted different minority groups, including women, the LGBT community,
the black community, among others.
CSR-HR interface
CSR-HR interface points out to the practices and services offered to employees for
engaging in CSR initiatives. Several of these practices were disclosed by the corporations
through their websites (n = 19) and GPTWf reviews (n = 10). A majority of the corporations
that adhered to this practice has done so through matching gifts and volunteer time off.
Matching gifts is when a corporation matches the donation done by its employees either
completely or partially to the charity that its employees donate to. Volunteer time off is
allowing employees to volunteer for a certain amount of paid workdays. Some corporations
encourage their employees to participate in Pro-Bono programs in their volunteered time
off, where employees use their skills in the volunteering initiatives. Awards are also given to
employees who are perceived to have profound impact on their communities through their
volunteering. Few corporations also reported giving incentives and encouraging employees
to be more environmentally friendly. EMC offers its employees shuttle programs that aid in
reducing carbon emissions, electric car charging stations and preferential parking spaces
for low emission vehicles. These practices and services disclosed by the corporations, if
truly practiced, aid in encouraging employees to participate in CSR initiatives and facilitate
the process of participation. They further allow for the cascading of CSR to all the ranks
within the organization out of the valued importance of such practices by top management.
CSR-HR interface was barely discussed in the SRHRP literature, as most other practices.
PAGE 290
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
Due to the infancy of this topic, it is not strange that much of the practices extracted are not
present in the SRHRP or HR disclosures literature. This study acts as their gateway to the
SRHRP and HR disclosures literature. It explores the manner these practices have been
employed at multinational corporations, allowing both practitioners and researchers to learn
lessons from the big pioneers in the field. However, the study is not exhaustive in any way,
as these practices should be studied both separately and collectively. Case studies can
allow for this, while quantitative studies can aid in assessing the impact of each SRHRP on
work-related behaviors.
Concluding note
The human resource practices were disclosed by companies and GPtWf reviews in various
proportions. Discussions of these practices in this paper are proportionate to the extent of
their disclosures, with evident emphasis made on “compensation and benefits” and
“diversity and inclusion”. The emphasis on the former, mainly salaries, health insurance and
trainings, is aimed at being perceived as an attractive and a socially responsible employer
and came in compliance with the demand for more disclosures related to these themes
(Das, 2011). The emphasis on the latter is aimed at embracing various stakeholders, by
widening the minorities’ talent pipeline and offering equitable growth. These were not
highlighted in the SRHRM or HR disclosures literature. This study, thus, provides a valuable
contribution by exploring these themes real-life contexts. These are considered as original
attempts at inclusion, given that they are actually supported and practiced to the best of
abilities and intentions.
A vast majority of the disclosures fall under the employee-oriented HRM component, rather
than the legal or the CSR facilitation component, as classified by Shen and Zhu (2011).
Most of the practices under “Employment” and “Diversity and inclusion” themes, which got
the lion’s share of disclosures, are actually employee-oriented HRM practices, as they
enhance the employees’ work experiences. General CSR-HR facilitation component was
discussed, but in less proportion under the theme CSR-HR interface. The legal compliance
component was scarcely disclosed in the companies’ reports, with the exception of child
labor issues and thus is not discussed in this paper.
The disclosed human resource practices are nothing but socially responsible acts. They are
integrated into most aspects of employees’ work-life and thus cannot be perceived as just
agenda building measures. They go beyond enhancing the corporations’ image to improve
the employees’ work experiences. However, the former does not negate the other, as
securing an attractive employer status and engaging in social responsibility are two sides of
the same currency, as stressed by Daimler Financial Services. The disclosures are too
extensive and detailed to be faked. After all, these corporations have thousands of
employees worldwide and will likely face a backlash in case of falsified or fabricated
disclosures.
The SRHRPs discussed in different academic sources (Kundu and Gahlawat, 2015; Shen
and Benson, 2016; European Commission 2001 as cited in Kundu and Gahlawat, 2015)
were all touched upon and reported by the corporations understudy. The fact that
companies’ practices are more abundant than those mentioned in the literature depicts that
the literature on SRHRP and HR disclosures is still developing and this paper aids in its
enrichment.
This paper discussed the SRHRPs in 23 multinational corporations, which do not allow for
generalization. Future studies can address a larger number of corporations by relying on
different lists with larger samples. This paper included only multinational corporations with a
minimum of 5,000 employees. Future research can entail small and medium sized
enterprises as CSR is perceived to be vital for corporations, regardless of size (Crowther,
2014). Future research can follow-up on these employee-related practices and measure
VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j PAGE 291
their impacts on the well-being of the employees and their effects on the corporations which
are employing them. Moreover, future research can aim at pinpointing any discrepancies
between the disclosures and the real practices. Findings in this paper can be a reference
for practitioners in large-sized enterprises who wish to incorporate SRHRPS into their
organizations, as well as for smaller enterprises which can use these revealed practices as
a benchmark. In providing lessons on responsible management, “the how is as important-if
not more-than the what” (Rimanoczy, 2016, p. 26), and this paper aims at exactly that
through its portrayal of responsible practices.
References
Alvarez, A. (2015), “Corporate response to human resource disclosure recommendations”, Social
Responsibility Journal, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 306-323.
pez-Fernández, M. and Romero-Fernández, P.M. (2016), “Efectos de las
Barrena-Martı́nez, J., Lo
polı́ticas de recursos humanos socialmente responsables en el capital intelectual”, Intangible Capital,
Vol. 12 No. 2, p. 549.
Becker-Olsen, K.L., Cudmore, B.A. and Hill, R.P. (2006), “The impact of perceived corporate social
responsibility on consumer behavior”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59 No. 1, pp. 46-53.
Bernardi, R.A. (2006), “Does female representation on boards of directors associate with fortune’s 100
best companies to work for list?”, Business & Society, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 235-248.
Blau, P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, Wiley, New York, NY.
Branco, M.C. and Rodrigues, L.L. (2009), “Exploring the importance of social responsibility disclosure for
human resources”, Journal of HRCA: Human Resource Costing & Accounting, Vol. 13 No. 3, p. 186.
Cameron, K. (2011), “Responsible leadership as virtuous leadership”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 98
No. S1, pp. 25-35.
Campopiano, G. and De Massis, A. (2015), “Corporate social responsibility reporting: a content analysis
in family and non-family firms”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 129 No. 3, pp. 511-534.
Craig, R. and Hussey, R. (1982), Keeping Employees Informed, Butterworths, Sydney.
Cropanzano, R. and Mitchell, M.S. (2005), “Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review”, Journal
of Management, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 874-900.
Crowther, D. (2014), “Introduction”, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 10 No. 3.
Curtin, P.A. (1999), “Reevaluating public relations information subsidies: market-driven journalism and
agenda-building theory and practice”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 53-90.
Das, S.C. (2013), “Corporate social reporting and human resource disclosures: experiences from
insurance companies in India”, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 19-32.
De Roeck, K., Marique, G., Stinglhamber, F. and Swaen, V. (2014), “Understanding employees’
responses to corporate social responsibility: mediating roles of overall justice and organisational
identification”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 91-112.
Doh, J.P. and Quigley, N.R. (2014), “Responsible leadership and stakeholder management: influence
pathways and organizational outcomes”, The Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 28 No. 3,
p. 255.
Doh, J.P., Stumpf, S.A. and Tymon, W.G. (2011), “Responsible leadership helps retain talent in India”,
Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 98 No. S1, pp. 85-100.
Dominguez, A.A. (2011), “The impact of human resource disclosure on corporate image”, Journal of
HRCA: Human Resource Costing & Accounting, Vol. 15 No. 4, p. 279.
Duriau, V.J., Reger, R.K. and Pfarrer, M.D. (2007), “A content analysis of the content analysis literature in
organization studies: research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements”, Organizational
Research Methods, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 5-34.
Ehnert, I. (2016), “Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting
practices by the world’s largest companies”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management,
Vol. 27 Nos 1/2, pp. 88-108.
PAGE 292
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
Filbeck, G. and Preece, D. (2003), “Fortune’s best 100 companies to work for in America: do they work for
shareholders?”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 771-797.
Frangieh, C.G. and Yaacoub, H.K. (2017), “A systematic literature review of responsible leadership:
challenges, outcomes and practices”, Journal of Global Responsibility, Vol. 8 No. 2, p. 281.
Frederiksen, J. and Westphalen, S.A. (1998), “Human resource accounting interest and conflicts: a
discussion paper”, European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, Thessaloniki.
Freeman, R.E., Wicks, A.C. and Parmar, B. (2004), “Stakeholder theory and ‘the corporate objective
revisited”, Organization Science, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 364-369.
Garcia, M.M. and Greenwood, K. (2015), “Visualizing CSR: a visual framing analysis of US multinational
companies”, Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 167-184.
Gomez, A.M.D. and Crowther, D. (2012), Corporate Social Responsibility: Human Dignity and
Managerial Responsibility: Diversity, Rights, and Sustainability, Taylor and Francis, Milton Park,
Didcot.
Greatplacetowork.in (2017), “Trust index© assessment – great place to work India”, available at: www.
greatplacetowork.in/our-services/assess-your-organisation/trust-index-assessment (accessed 1 October
2017).
Greatplacetowork.net (2017), “How you’re evaluated – great place to work global”, available at: www.
greatplacetowork.net/best-companies/about-applying-to-best-companies-lists/how-youre-evaluated
(accessed 1 October 2017).
Greenwood, M. (2013), “Ethical analyses of HRM: a review and research agenda”, Journal of Business
Ethics, Vol. 114 No. 2, pp. 355-366.
Gropper, D.M. and Jahera, J.S. Jr (2005), “CEO compensation and the fortune 100 best places to work:
1”, Corporate Finance Review, Vol. 9 No. 6, p. 19.
Holsti, O.R. (1969), Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Addison-Wesley, Reading,
MA.
Jahdi, K.S. and Acikdilli, G. (2009), “Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility
(CSR): marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding?”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 88 No. 1,
pp. 103-113.
Jamali, D.R., El Dirani, A.M. and Harwood, I.A. (2015), “Exploring human resource management roles in
corporate social responsibility: the CSR-HRM co-creation model”, Business Ethics: A European Review,
Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 125-143.
Jamali, D., Safieddine, A.M. and Rabbath, M. (2008), “Corporate governance and corporate social
responsibility synergies and interrelationships”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 16
No. 5, pp. 443-459.
Johnson, B.R., Connolly, E. and Carter, T.S. (2011), “Corporate social responsibility: the role of fortune
100 companies in domestic and international natural disasters”, Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 352-369.
Kabanoff, B. (1996), “Computers can read as well as count: how computer-aided text analysis can
benefit organisational research”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 3, p. 1.
Krippendorff, K. (1989), “Content analysis”, in Barnouw, E., Gerbner, G., Schramm, W., Worth, T.L. and
Gross, L. (Eds), International Encyclopedia of Communication, Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, New York,
NY, pp. 403-407.
Kundu, S.C. (2003), “Workforce diversity status: a study of employees’ reactions”, Industrial Management &
Data Systems, Vol. 103 Nos 3/4, pp. 215-226.
Kundu, S.C. and Gahlawat, N. (2015), “Socially responsible HR practices and employees’ intention to
quit: the mediating role of job satisfaction”, Human Resource Development International, Vol. 18 No. 4,
pp. 387-420.
Lewis, T. (2011), “Assessing social identity and collective efficacy as theories of group motivation at
work”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 963-980.
Liu, M., Wong, I.A., Chu, R., Shi, G.J., Brock, J.L. and Tseng, T. (2014), “Can a socially responsible casino
better retain its management staff? From an internal customer perspective”, Asia Pacific Journal of
Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 520-539.
VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j PAGE 293
Maak, T. (2007), “Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social
capital”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 74 No. 4, pp. 329-343.
Maak, T. and Pless, N.M. (2006), “Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society: a relational
perspective”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 99-115.
Mankelow, G. (2008), “Social responsibility paradox of small business human resource management
practices”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 19 No. 12, pp. 2171-2181.
Mattila, A.S., Hanks, L. and Kim, E.E.K. (2011), “The impact of company type and corporate social
responsibility messaging on consumer perceptions”, Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing
Practice, Vol. 12 No. 3, p. 288.
Maxfield, M.G. and Babbie, E.R. (2013), Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology, 7th ed.,
Wadsworth, Stamford, CT.
Mishra, S. and Suar, D. (2010), “Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian
companies?”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 95 No. 4, pp. 571-601.
Miska, C., Hilbe, C. and Mayer, S. (2014), “Reconciling different views on responsible leadership: a
rationality-based approach”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 125 No. 2, pp. 349-360.
Neuendorf, K.A. (2002), The Content Analysis Guidebook, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Newman, A., Miao, Q., Hofman, P.S. and Zhu, C.J. (2016), “The impact of socially responsible human
resource management on employees’ organizational citizenship behaviour: the mediating role of
organizational identification”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 27 No. 4,
pp. 440-455.
 ėtaitė, R. (2018), “Effects of responsible human resource management
Nie, D., Lämsä, A. and Puc
practices on female employees’ turnover intentions”, Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 27 No. 1,
pp. 29-41.
Palmer, T.B. and Short, J.C. (2008), “Mission statements in US colleges of business: an empirical
examination of their content with linkages to configurations and performance”, Academy of Management
Learning & Education, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 454-470.
Payne, G.T., Brigham, K.H., Broberg, J.C., Moss, T.W. and Short, J.C. (2011), “Organizational virtue
orientation and family firms”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 257-285.
Potter, W.J. and Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999), “Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis”,
Journal of Applied Communication Research, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 258-284.
Preuss, L., Haunschild, A. and Matten, D. (2009), “The rise of CSR: implications for HRM and
employee representation”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 20
No. 4, pp. 953-973.
Rimanoczy, I. (2016), Stop Teaching: Principles and Practices for Responsible Management Education,
Business Expert Press, New York, NY.
Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2015), 2016, Research Methods for Business Students, 7th
ed., Pearson Education, Harlow.
Shen, J. and Benson, J. (2016), “When CSR is a social norm: how socially responsible human resource
management affects employee work behavior”, Journal of Management, Vol. 42 No. 6, pp. 1723-1746.
Shen, J. and Zhu, J.C. (2011), “Effects of socially responsible human resource management on employee
organizational commitment”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 22 No. 15,
pp. 3020-3035.
Smithin, T. and Huff, A.S. (1991), “Mapping strategic thought”, The Journal of the Operational Research
Society, Vol. 42 No. 11, p. 1033.
Turker, D. (2009), “How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment”, Journal of
Business Ethics, Vol. 89 No. 2, pp. 189-204.
Vanhamme, J. and Grobben, B. (2009), “Too good to be true!’. The effectiveness of CSR history in
countering negative publicity”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 85 No. S2, pp. 273-283.
Voegtlin, C., Patzer, M. and Scherer, A.G. (2012), “Responsible leadership in global business: a new
approach to leadership and its Multi-Level outcomes”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 105 No. 1,
pp. 1-16.
PAGE 294
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
Vuontisjärvi, T. (2006), “Corporate social reporting in the European context and human resource
disclosures: an analysis of Finnish companies”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 69 No. 4, pp. 331-354.
Waldman, D.A. and Galvin, B.M. (2008), “Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership”,
Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 327-341.
Wang, S., Huang, W., Gao, Y., Ansett, S. and Xu, S. (2015), “Can socially responsible leaders drive
Chinese firm performance?”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 36 No. 4,
pp. 435-450.
Weber, R.P. (1985), Basic Content Analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Work (2017), “How We picked the 25 best workplaces – great place to work India”, available at: www.
greatplacetowork.in/best-companies/worlds-best-multinationals/how-we-chose-the-best (accessed 1
October 2017).
Yang, X. and Rivers, C. (2009), “Antecedents of CSR practices in MNCs’ subsidiaries: a stakeholder and
institutional perspective”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 86 No. 2, pp. 155-169.
Further reading
Pless, N.M., Maak, T. and Waldman, D.A. (2012), “Different approaches toward doing the right thing:
mapping the responsibility orientations of leaders”, The Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 26
No. 4, p. 51.
Corresponding author
Charbel Greige Frangieh can be contacted at: charbel.frangieh@live.com
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
VOL. 15 NO. 3 2019
j SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL j PAGE 295
Reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further reproduction
prohibited without permission.