Literature Review and Conceptyal Framework
Running head: LITERATURE REVIEW 1 Abstract Review and Conceptual Framework Adolescent Aberration Programs/IPS Julie I Carter Capella University PSF8374-Currenr Analysis on Violent Behavior Dr.
Rob Hanser LITERATURE REVIEW 2 Abstract Review and Conceptual Framework History The history of breach arrested juveniles from academic processing began with the bearing of the adolescent courts. Conceived in the backward 19th century, adolescent amends provided for a rehabilitation-based acknowledgment to juveniles’ actionable behavior.
Punitive sanctions actuality accustomed by adolescence in bent courts were actuality set abreast in the adolescent courts. Thus, in its infancy, adolescent amends could be construed as a “diversion program”. Considered to be in the best absorption of the adolescent and society, adolescent amends absent adolescence from bent affairs by accouterment dispositions that were added attuned to the abeyant to change the adolescent offender’s behavior, and lives through analytic services, adapted rehabilitation programs, and bound educational guidance. (Models, 2010) First adopted by the developed bent amends system, was the abstraction of diversion.
This abstraction became the affair of altercation aural the adolescent amends arrangement in the 1960’s. The President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Amends recommended exploring alternatives for acclamation the needs of afflicted juveniles alfresco of the cloister arrangement in 1967. In 76, the Office of Adolescent Amends and Crime Prevention Adapted Emphasis Branch supplied 10 actor dollars in allotment accurately for the development of aberration programs. These efforts were carefully apprenticed by the acceptance that these types of programs would crop abounding enefits, such as acceptance juveniles the advantage to accept an another to court, accouterment added analysis at the association level, accretion ancestors participation, and best important, abbreviation the “stigma” associated with the academic adolescent amends system. (Models, 2010) As aberration has been accomplished and alike discussed for about four decades, some would altercate that there is little bendability in the agreement of what absolutely constitutes a aberration action or program, they do about accede on the accepted ambition amid these programs which is to abbreviate the juveniles’ captivation in the adolescent amends system.
LITERATURE REVIEW 3 Theoretical Concepts As abstinent by affairs evaluations and aftereffect studies, the capability of aberration programs has assorted abundantly from one affairs to the next. The acknowledged programs, such as the Accelerated Prevention Casework (IPS) action in Philadelphia, accommodate actual absolute casework that accommodate but are not bound to parenting education, accelerated ancestors counseling, and behavioral contracting.
One of the capital concepts that gave bearing to the development of this affairs was the labeling perspective. This approach or perspective, if you will, argues that juveniles who accomplish accessory offences become accepted offenders due to actuality singled out for abrogating recognition. This has been acclaimed as creating and reinforcing the juvenile’s, as able-bodied as society’s view, that they are criminals. Aberration programming again is advised to abetment in alienated these abrogating labels that accompany academic case processing. Roberts, 2004) In 1979, Paternoster, et al. explored the admeasurement to which juveniles discriminate amid academic cloister processing that after-effects in incarceration and breezy aberration processing with advertence to perceptions of accrued stigma and/or liabilities. The acumen of the juveniles was abstinent in agreement of academy performance; affectionate relationships, relationships with peers; adapted employment, and approaching captivation with the law. (Blomberg, n. d. The allegation adumbrated alone in the associate relationships breadth was there a notable aberration amid the perceptions of absent and confined juveniles. Back ascendancy was fabricated for the furnishings of above-mentioned amusing liabilities, such as amusing chic or race, the after-effects remained constant. Therefore one could achieve that to the admeasurement perceptions of stigma accept implications for consecutive behavior, it makes little aberration whether or not juveniles accept aberration or formally imposed bastille time.
In simple terms, the blazon of analysis would arise to not be cogent in abstraction self-perceptions. (Blomberg, n. d. ) LITERATURE REVIEW 4 Supporters of aberration abide to altercate that programs are beneath stigmatizing than academic cloister involvement, accommodate juveniles with casework that they would not accept contrarily received, and aftereffect in reductions in the amount of recidivism.
In contrast, opponents altercate that aberration programs accept continued amusing ascendancy to juveniles who would commonly be appear aback to the community, may absolutely access recidivism, do not anticipate stigmatation, and can advance to the asymmetric representation of minorities. As Akers (1994) explains, the labeling approach pushes advanced the apriorism that bodies who are labeled and/or badly stigmatized as deviant, are added than acceptable to booty on a aberrant self-identity and become more, rather than beneath aberrant than if they had not been so labeled.
Theoretically, a characterization of deviant, adolescent blackmailer or behind can affect the way that a adolescent comes to ascertain him/herself which influences approaching bent behaviors, and dictates the amusing roles the adolescent is accustomed to assume. (Dick, Pence, Jones & Geertsen, 2004) With that noted, some analysis has additionally adapted that aberration absolutely increases recidivism, about aboriginal studies begin little or no aberration in the backsliding ante amid absent and non-diverted youth.
Yet still others accept begin that, behindhand of the setting, interventions can as able-bodied access “perceived” labeling and self-reported crime amid youth. (Elliott, Dunford & Knowles, 1978) What was begin to be constant with the aftermost accumulation of award was the assignment done closing by Lemet (1981) that advance that these analysis interventions can appoint stigma on juveniles which leads to accessory deviance. This abstraction would be amenable for adopting the achievability that aberration programs may widen the net of the accompaniment arrangement by demography in juveniles who contrarily may accept not appear into acquaintance with the system.
What is important to point out actuality is that abounding of these studies were awry due to the difficulties advisers encountered back amalgam allegory groups for the purpose of evaluation. LITERATURE REVIEW 5 Contemporary Analysis There accept been so abounding altered behavior alleged “diversion” that the appellation has appear to awning polices as assorted as accomplishing annihilation to programs duplicate from the absolute practices of adolescent justice.
While these behavior accept produced bigger procedural amends for juveniles, bargain the bedfast and institutionalized citizenry of juveniles agreement them beneath the administration of accompaniment and/or bounded ancestors account agencies, these polices accept not resulted in the advised changes in the behaviors of the absent youth. (Akers & Sellers, 2009) Recent studies on aberration programs accept produced added absolute results. In fact, in a abstraction of the Detention Aberration Advocacy Activity it was begin that juveniles that were absent to aberration programs were beneath acceptable than their counterparts to be referred to out-of-home placement. Sheldon, 1999) In Michigan an appraisal of their accompaniment aberration activity yielded that juveniles that were about assigned to one of the several aberration affairs action groups were decidedly beneath acceptable to accept any cloister petitions filed adjoin them during the two years afterward absolution from the affairs compared to the ascendancy group. The after-effects apparent actuality cannot advice but advance that the “active” easily on action provided by aberration programming works bigger that the accustomed action of cloister processing adolescent offenders. The catch, it works best if they accept been thoroughly afar from the system. Davidson, Redner, Blakely, Mitchell & Emshoff, 1987) There is a abundance of evaluations of pretrial diversionary programs, and added absolute abstract about the pretrial aberration acreage is dated. One of the analytical challenges acclaimed for the bent amends acreage is developing and cataloging an adapted analysis architecture for aberration programs. Advisers in the acreage charge to actively accompany this claiming in adjustment to actuate the scope, as able-bodied as the account of aberration programming in the bent amends community. (Bellassai, Galloway.
Hubbard, Oeller & Sayler, 2006) LITERATURE REVIEW 6 In Philadelphia, there are several arising practices in the aberration affairs initiative. First they accept implemented accounting behavior and procedures for aberration programs that are backed by a academic mission statement. This is accounted as analytical as a acutely authentic and articulate mission statement, goals, and objectives are the cornerstone of able programs.
In a analysis conducted by the National Association of Pretrial Casework Agencies, about 90% of all respondents in their abstraction had accounting behavior and procedures in place. (Bellassai et al. , 2006) Nationwide, pretrial aberration concepts accept begin added legitimacy. About all states now accept pretrial statues that accept either been allowable or adapted back 2000, and are as assorted as aberration programs themselves. Aberration affairs today tend to affection a added arrangement of programs that are added assorted than their predecessors in practice, and authoritative location.
However, these programs are still affiliated by the ultimate ambition of alms applicable alternatives to juveniles whose bent behaviors are addressed abundant added finer alfresco the branch of acceptable case processing. (Bellassai, 2006) Recommendations The better claiming to pretrial aberration programs and bent amends planners is the abridgement of the able analysis that is bare in the field.
One ability of such a broad-based abstraction would be the assay of the attributes of the accord with the approach of labeling and the abeyant synergy aural the accepted analytic cloister model. The account actuality would appear as such a abstraction would be enumerable and accommodate an evidenced-based foundation for communities to accomplish complete decisions about aberration programming. (Bellassai. 2006) LITERATURE REVIEW 7 References Akers, R.
L. & Sellers, C. S. (2009) Criminological Theories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Bellassai, J. , Galloway, K. , Hubbard, A. , Oeller, C. & Sayler, J. (2006) Promising practices in pretrial diversion. Retrieved November 10, 2012 from http://www. ojp. usdoj. gov/BJA/about/index. html Blomberg, T. G. (n. d. ) Widening the net: An aberration in the appraisal of aberration programs. Retrieved November, 9, 2012 from http://www. criminology. fsu. edu/crimtheory/blomberg/netwidening. html Davidson, W. S. , Redner, R. , Blakely, C. H. Mitchell, C. M. & Emshoff, J. G. (1987) Aberration of adolescent Offenders: An beginning comparison. Journal of Consulting and Analytic Psychology 55(1) 68-75 Dick, A. J. , Pence, D. J. , Jones, R. M. & Geertsen, H. R. (2004) The charge for approach in assessing associate courts. American Scientist 47:1448-61 Elliot, D. S. , Dunford, F. W. & Knowles, B. A. (1978) A Abstraction of Another Processing Practices: An Overview of Initial Abstraction Findings. Boulder, CO: B. R. Institute Models for Change Systems: Reform in Adolescent Justice, July 2010.
Retrieved from http://www. modelsforchange. net Paternoster, R. , Waldo, G. , Chiricos, T. & Anderson, L. (1979) The Stigma of Diversion: Labeling in the Adolescent Amends System. Beverly Hills. CA: Sage Publications Roberts, A. R. (2004) Emergence and admeasurement of adolescent aberration programs. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Sheldon, R. G. (1999) Detention Aberration Advocacy: An Evaluation. Adolescent Amends Bulletin. Washington, D. C. : U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Adolescent and Crime Prevention.
Order a unique copy of this paper