Applying Ethics in the Armed Forces
In Rob Reiner’s 1992 film, “A Few Acceptable Men”, two ethical approaches to activity are illustrated best greatly in four capital characters.
Protagonist Lieutenant Daniel Kaffee, played by Tom Cruise, is in absolute moral adverse to the adversary of the film, Colonel Nathan Jessep, played by Jack Nicholson. Kaffee finer illustrates the accent of application the ethical framework of the accepted acceptable access while Jessep shows the flaws inherent in the advantage approach.
The access taken by Kaffee ensures that association is seamless in chastity and that the Marines are not a accumulation that is alfresco of either the law or accepted morality. Jessep, however, shows that virtues or belief that commanders appeal of subordinates in the aggressive can belie the virtues of the accepted actuality and the accepted good.
The actual important two characters are the conflicted and court-martialed Lance Corporal Harold W. Dawson and Private Lowden Downey. These are Marines that adequate their assurance in their administrator and charge after apprentice to assurance their advocate Kaffee and the candor of aggressive law.
Dawson and Downey aboriginal appear to the absorption of Lieutenant Kaffee back the two are accused of causing the afterlife of Private William Santiago. It was after apparent that the two were either anon or alongside encouraged to admit a “Code Red’, which is a anatomy of Marine self-policing, area weaker affiliate were afraid via altered methods to become stronger, bigger Marines.
The men accept allegedly blimp a rag into the aperture of Private Santiago, constant in his death. It becomes bright that the men will not allege of the abomination in question, due to the account cipher of Marines.
It after becomes clear, as well, that Gitmo is beheld as a actual altered abode with actual altered values. Back the Marine Administrator Jessep is accused of his role of creating such an abandoned altitude that after-effects in a man’s death, he states that he has “a greater albatross than [you] can possibly fathom”.
Learning that the aggressive ability may accept a abstracted moral ability amidst with altered ethical mores, the catechism becomes are Dawson and Downey are about blameworthy?
Since Colonel Jessep appears to advance the advantage access while accompanying instilling an atmosphere of blackout and alliance in his Marines at Gitmo, a baby island afar from the blow of the world, to not chase his instructions would be unthinkable. To Jessep, his Marines are men aloft abuse and catechism and accustomed the assignment of attention their adolescent soldiers in a abode that is consistently in crisis of alfresco harm.
The advantage access that he instills in men like Dawson and Downey are to the aftereffect that “a actuality who has developed virtues will be artlessly disposed to act in agency constant with moral principles” (Velasquez, et al, 1996).
These virtues and attempt were the cornerstone of the adaptation of the two men in question, they believed that there was no accessible to way to abnegate or debris any orders accustomed by their blameless commander. The virtues accomplished and preached by Jessep were courage, strength, silence, and submission.
Above all abroad these men learned, also, that they charge consistently abide to their superiors in all they were asked to do. For this reason, these men are not absolutely blameworthy, as if they would accept banned absolute orders, they would accept absent their advantage and in aspect the actual bolt of their lives. The moral questions of advantage and accepted acceptable become the bolt of the cloister hearing.
Lieutenant Kaffee apropos himself with the ethical affair of the accepted acceptable access to belief and instills the absolute credibility of advantage access by announcement compassion, fairness, and integrity. The Accepted Acceptable access about deals with an abstraction that alone acceptable is equated and ensured with accessible acceptable and that individual, atonement ancestry should be aggregate as a association in a advantageous fashion.
In this way, goodness, is not acceptable if it is not shared. It can be said, then, that in adjustment to admit acceptable to allotment it, we charge additionally be able to admit bad or “evil”, in adjustment to apperceive how to adverse it in a apple of chargeless will.
“Appeals to the accepted acceptable appetite us to appearance ourselves as associates of the aforementioned community, absorption on ample questions apropos the affectionate of association we appetite to become and how we are to accomplish that society” (Velasquez, et al, 1996).
In this way Kaffee shows that Gitmo is a allotment of the beyond apple and that amends should be served to ensure that the aggressive and the blow of the apple can accomplish fairness. Jessep is apparent as amiss in his accomplishments and Kaffee assures Dawson that a actuality does not charge to accept a application on his or her arm to accept honor.
This byword agency so abundant to the Marine, who was artlessly afterward orders in a bearded mission. Had he not been subjected to the affair of his commander, he would accept been a acceptable soldier. But, he cannot acknowledgment to his duties and charge again appearance account in his circadian life, hopefully Kaffee has illustrated this account and the uselessness of rank, adulterated reasoning, and a simple application on one’s arm that does not accept morality.
In closing, “A Few Acceptable Men” in an accomplished blur to assay in ambience of behavior and ethical approaches. The two illustrated approaches of advantage and the accepted acceptable can be apparent as a alternating affair throughout the work. The actors all affectation their account and belief of chastity and a cipher of honor.
The bearded and displaced ethical approaches and after-effects are abstract to affectation their abeyant risks while the important and advantageous ethical approaches are displayed in memorable appearance with amends actuality added than a allotment of a cloister proceeding, it becomes a allotment of a new account cipher for all affected.
Schickel, Richard. (December 14th, 1992). “Close-Order Moral Drill”. Time. 70.
Velasquez, M., Andre, C., Shanks, T, Meyer, S. J. & Meyer M. (Winter, 1996). “Thinking Ethically: A Framework for Moral Decision Making” in Issues in Ethics. 2-5.
Order a unique copy of this paper