Phase 5 Individual Project (1 to 2 pages)

The final paper has multiple sections. Please read the following carefully.

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Review the comments from your instructor and classmates and make revisions to your Phase 4 Individual Project. Then, add a 1-2 page response to the following questions in your final draft:

 

  • Can science help answer questions about how or if we should be using non-renewable energy resources?
  • To support your answer, select one example (e.g. oil in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge, oil in the Middle East, mountaintop mining in Kentucky) and explain the role of science in the decision-making process.

 

The above information is to be compiled into one document and submitted as the final paper. This document will contain five sections: Title Page, Abstract, P4IP (with revisions), P5IP Prompts, and the Combined Reference Section. Make sure all references are cited properly!

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

RUNING HEAD: THE CONTINENTAL DRIFT THEORY
1

THE CONTINENTAL DRIFT THEORY 2

The Continental Drift Theory

Benjamin Bogan

SCI101-1303B-11: Introduction to the Sciences

9/16/13

The Continental Drift Theory

The continental drift theory was developed by a German scientist, Alfred Wegener. In his book, The Origin of Continents and Oceans, he argued that the continental landmasses were drifting across the earth. He based this on the fact that the coast of Western Africa and South America looked like the edges of interlocking pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. He was thus convinced that the two were once part of an enormous single landmass known as Pangaea before it split apart. This was supported by geological and biological similarities in these areas. The development of this theory spearheaded a lot of research since many scientists did not agree with the idea. It led to more developments in the mid and late 20th century that proved that the landmasses were in constant motion. The additions on the Wegener’s evidence include paleomagnetism and seafloor spreading.

Paleomagnetism is the study of the intensity and orientation of the Earth’s magnetic field as preserved in the magnetic orientation of certain minerals present in rocks. Many scientists have explored this field to find  evidence of continental drift. When hot magma rises and cools on the surface of the Earth, the minerals present become magnetized in alignment with the Earth’s magnetic field. Rocks formed at different places on the Earth’s surface have different magnetizations. Some rocks have magnetizations that do not agree with their position on the Earth but this is due to the wandering of the Earth’s magnetic poles. Using the alignment of magnetic minerals in the rock layers, the movement of the magnetic poles could be traced through the different geologic periods. The record of direction and intensity of magnetic field kept by certain minerals in rocks provide information on the past behavior of Earth’s magnetic field and the past location of tectonic plates. This is therefore an evidence of landmasses drifting. The magnetized minerals also show the direction to the Earth’s magnetic poles and provide a means of determining their latitude of origin. Polar wandering, which is the apparent movement of the magnetic poles illustrated in rocks, indicates that continents have moved. This is shown in polar wandering curves. The curves for North America and Europe have similar shapes but are separated by about 240 of longitude. The difference between the paths can be reconciled if the continents are placed next to one another.

In 1962, Harry Hess, a geologist and an army commander during the World War II, added a geologic mechanism to account for Wegener’s moving continents. During his work to determine the deepest part of the sea, he discovered hundreds of flat-topped mountains that shaped the floor of the Pacific Ocean. He thus proposed the sea floor spreading as an evidence of continental drift. He proved Wegener’s idea right and clarified the mechanism that broke the once joined continents. Sea floor spreading is the process in which the ocean floor is extended when two plates move apart forming cracks. Magma rises through the cracks and seeps out onto the ocean floor like a long thin undersea volcano. The sea floor moves in a conveyor belt fashion thus explaining the phenomenon of the youngest rocks being found only at the mid ocean ridges and they get older as they move away from the ridge. Mantle convection at plate boundaries of the sea floor is the driving force for the motion of the floor and the continents themselves. When hot magma rises, it cools and hardens upon reaching the surface. As more magma rises the present sea floor is pushed aside making the cold and dense rocks to sink and melt becoming magma again. Sea floor spreading was developed due to the understanding of the plate tectonic theory. At this zone where two oceanic plates are moving away from each other, there is the formation of new crust. This is known as a constructive zone. Features such as the Mid Atlantic Ridge were formed due to this thus clear evidence that continents are drifting.

The Wegener’s hypothesis of continental drift was earlier rejected by scientists because it lacked a mechanism which would have led the continents to drift. He did not explain clearly how the continents moved which would have made it easy to justify the time it took for the present day continents to move to where they are. During that time it was also hard to accept that the continents are in constant motion since no major evident motion had been witnessed. His ideas were however accepted in the mid-20th century with the development of other geological evidence to supplement his earlier findings. The plate tectonic theory illustrated clearly, explaining that the Earth’s crust is made up of plates which are in constant motion thus the drifting of continents. Other evidence such as the sea floor spreading also made scientist to agree to Wegener’s hypothesis. The other reason that may have led to rejection of Wegener’s idea may be because it had not gone through the scientific method of theory development thus it could not be accepted without enough testing for approval. Scientists today accept the movement of continents since the hypothesis was tested and became a theory.

The scientific method is the act of scientists, collectively over time, creating models of the natural world that can be verified experimentally. The method involves observation, data collection and recording and analyzing in a form that can be duplicated by other scientists. The method involves four important steps i.e. observation and description of  phenomena, hypothesis formulation to explain the phenomena, testing the hypothesis by analyzing the results of observation or by predicting and observing the existence of new phenomena that follow from the hypothesis, and establishing a theory based on repeated verification of the results. The hypothesis is only regarded as a theory or law of nature if the experiments bear out. If the experiments do not bear out, the hypothesis must be rejected or modified. This method is helpful in the understanding of the natural world since it is empirical. It minimizes the influence of personal and cultural beliefs when developing a theory.

The Wegener’s hypothesis of movement of continents was rejected by scientists because it did not have a mechanism which initiated the movement. They later accepted with the development of plate tectonic theory which provided a mechanism for continental drift. The Earth’s crust is made of plates which move away from each other, towards each other and slide past one another. The plates include both oceanic and continental namely; Eurasian, Australian-Indian, Philippine, Pacific, Juan de Fuca, Nazca, Cocos, North American, Caribbean, South American, African, Arabian and the Antarctic plate. These movements initiate the movement of continents due to the forces involved. At the constructive zone for example, the mantle convection is a driving force for the motion of the sea floor and the continents. The forces of extension in this boundary also lead to plate movement in opposite directions thus movement of continents. Since most plates include an entire continent plus a large area of the sea floor, when the plates move, the continents move.

When two continental plates move away from each other, a rift valley is formed. This is accompanied by volcanic activities on the floor thus formation of volcanic features. In the case of oceanic plates, mid oceanic ridges are formed. When an oceanic plate collides with a continental plate, the oceanic is forced underneath the continental plate, a process known as subduction. This zone is characterized by volcanic and seismic activities due to the energy generated. An example is the Pacific ring of fire. When two continental plates collide, fold mountains such as the Himalayas are formed.

The continental drift has today gained the support of scientists due to evidence such as plate tectonics which were developed to support the Wegener’s argument.

References

Edwards, J. (2005). Plate tectonics and continental drift. London, United Kingdom: Evans Brothers.

Frisch, W., Meschede, M., & Blakey, R. C. (2010). Plate tectonics: Continental drift and mountain building. New York, NY: Springer.

Are you stuck with your online class?
Get help from our team of writers!

Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code RAPID