Review the attached PDF for assignment details and follow all instructions.
PHIL110Critical Thinking – SPS CUNY
Unit 8 Discussion Assignment
Multimedia Fallacies
Step 1.
There are many websites that provide information on both formal and informal fallacies. For
example: the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (entry on “Fallacies”), the Nizkor Project, and
the Fallacy Files. Your discussion assignment is to first visit each of these sites and find the
fallacies that correspond to those in Unit 9 and 10 (what we’ve studied so far).
Step 2.
After you feel comfortable recognizing fallacies of failed or flawed induction, conduct a search
online and find one video or cartoon example for one of these fallacies. Your multi-media
example must take the form of a video/image/cartoon (check out YouTube, for instance, or
search for the fallacies in cartoon banks). The Cartoon Network, Family Guy, Stephen
Colbert/Jon Stewart, or even just plain old cartoon websites are good places to look.
Step 3.
Once you’ve located the example, re-construct the fallacy from the video or cartoon. You can
refer back to the Logically Fallacious site, which we used in Unit 7 discussion to find additional
examples and logical form for your fallacy. Embed the multi-media example on the Discussion
Forum (or you can paste in the link), and include your reconstruction and analysis. Be sure to
address the following:
• Clearly state what fallacy your example represents.
• Share your reconstructed fallacy and make sure to present the full argument (that the
video, image or cartoon presents) by identifying its implicit premise(s) and conclusion.
• Explain why you think this is a good example of the fallacy.
Step 4.
Read and respond to other students’ posts with substantial comments that follow these
commenting points:
• Do you think their reconstruction of the fallacy is well done? If not, how would you
reconstruct it?
• Do you think their multi-media represents the fallacy they claimed? If not, what fallacy
do you think it represents?
• What variations on their fallacy have you encountered, if any? Or have you seen their
multi-media somewhere before and were you aware that it represented a fallacy?
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/index.html
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/3/Book-Contents
PHIL110 Critical Thinking – SPS CUNY
• Do you have any questions for them regarding the content of their multi-media or about
the process of identifying the fallacy?
Recommendations for Success and Grading Criteria:
• Respond to the assignment with clear and detailed answers, organized thoughts.
• Follow all assignment prompts and answers all prompt questions.
• Incorporate relevant examples and evidence to support claims.
• Write clearly and without errors a well-composed answer and post it on time.
• Respond to other students with interesting comments and follow-up
questions. Acknowledge all students who commented on your post.
Appeal to fear: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/32/Appeal-to-Fear Appeal to emotion: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/29/Appeal-to-Emotion Appeal to anger: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/20/Appeal-to-Anger Appeal to pity: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/39/Appeal-to-Pity Appeal to spite: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/211/Appeal-to-Spite Straw Man: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/169/Strawman-Fallacy Red Herring: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/150/Red-Herring Ad Hominem (abusive): https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/1/Ad-Hominem-Abusive Ad Hominem (guilt by association): https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/10/Ad-Hominem-Guilt-byAssociation